Our Group: Group C
Feedback For: Group A
Overall Impression
The learning resource presents valuable and accessible information on Alzheimer’s disease. It appears to be designed with clarity and empathy, aiming to raise awareness and understanding among a general audience. That said, there are a few areas where the structure, interactivity, and alignment with instructional design principles could be strengthened.
Clarity of the Lesson
Strengths: The tone is approachable, and the language is generally clear and accessible. The topic is introduced in a simple and inviting way.
Suggestions:
You might consider adding clear learning objectives or outcomes at the beginning of the lesson. This would help users understand what they should gain from the resource.
Is there a way to segment the content more visually? Currently, most of the material is presented in long paragraphs—perhaps subheadings or bullet points could improve readability.
Learning Outcomes & Alignment
Observations:
I might have missed them, but I didn’t see any explicit learning outcomes listed.
Suggestions:
You might consider framing your outcomes using action verbs like “Describe,” “Identify,” or “Explain.”
E.g., “By the end of this module, learners will be able to describe the early symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease.”
Once outcomes are added, it would be helpful to ensure that each section aligns with those stated goals. For example, if one outcome is about understanding risk factors, make sure there’s a section clearly dedicated to that.
Interactivity
Observations:
Most of the content is static text with some videos embedded.
Suggestions:
In what way is this activity interactive? Consider adding knowledge check questions, drag-and-drop activities, or even a simple poll or reflection prompt.
You might consider using tools like H5P to add interactive elements that reinforce key concepts.
Inclusivity
Strengths: The tone is respectful and avoids jargon, which is great for accessibility.
Suggestions:
Consider whether there are multiple perspectives represented in the content—e.g., voices of caregivers, or cultural views on aging and dementia.
Are the videos captioned for accessibility? Ensuring closed captions or transcripts are available would enhance inclusivity.
Technology Use & Rationale
Observations: The website is functional and mobile-friendly, with multimedia elements included.
Suggestions:
Could you briefly explain your rationale for using video versus other tools? For example: “Videos were selected to provide visual context and emotional connection…”
You might also consider adding a short tutorial or guiding question before a video to help learners focus.
Presentation
Strengths: The use of images and white space is helpful.
Suggestions:
There are a few areas where the font size and contrast could be more readable.
Could the visual flow be improved with section headers or icons?
Final Thoughts
This resource offers great potential and conveys information in a compassionate way. To further improve it, I suggest:
Adding explicit outcomes and aligning content with them.
Increasing interactivity for deeper engagement.
Enhancing accessibility and inclusivity.
Including citations for key claims or statistics.
Keep up the great work—this is a meaningful topic, and the resource already shows a strong foundation!
Recent Comments